3 Why Humans Can Use FBM · 3.5 Human, Feline, and Canine Boundary
3.5 Human, Feline, and Canine Boundary
Human Fat-Based Metabolism
This page is structured as definition, control variables, causal chain, observable outputs, and boundary, and serves as a canonical definition node in Human FBM.
Human, feline, and canine FBM share reduced exogenous carbohydrate input and reduced insulin occupancy logic.
They differ in species constraints, feeding architecture, and boundary conditions.
Felines usually have tighter exogenous carbohydrate input tolerance and solute-boundary constraints.
Canines show broader flexibility than felines but remain input-structure constrained.
Humans show broader flexibility, with emphasis on sustainable low-occupancy fatty-acid steady state.
The same input strategy can produce different occupancy and output patterns across species.
Cross-species transfer should remain at logic level, not direct parameter duplication.
Feline systems show stronger sensitivity in urinary and digestive boundary outputs.
Human outputs are more influenced by behavior rhythm, energy sufficiency, and execution consistency.
Cross-species content can transfer logic but not threshold conclusions.
This page is not a basis for single-species overextension claims.