3 Four Functional Systems · 3.2 DMN Historical Template Matching and Explanation System
3.2 DMN Historical Template Matching and Explanation System
Human Behavior FCA
This page is structured as definition, control variables, causal chain, observable outputs, and boundary, and serves as a canonical definition node in Human Behavior FCA.
DMN is the historical template matching and explanation system.
It calls historical structure to interpret current input and maintain continuity, and does not generate genuinely new structures.
DMN offers stability and lock-in risk at the same time, requiring calibration through feedback update.
Template invocation frequency determines dependence on old experience.
Template matching threshold determines the probability of absorbing new input into old frames.
Interpretation consistency balances short-term stability and long-term adaptation.
FP takeover capacity determines whether DMN monopolizes the chain.
Feedback-update effectiveness determines whether DMN templates are revised.
Observable Output → Foreground Entry → Historical Template Matching and Explanation → New Structure Generation → Execution Maintenance → Feedback Update.
DMN sits at the interpretation stage and determines absorption into old templates versus handoff to new-structure generation.
When DMN dominates while feedback update weakens, the system tilts toward repetition and lock-in.
Interpretation language and decision preference remain highly similar across contexts.
Old narratives are invoked first under conflict input, reducing innovation behavior.
Short-term stability rises while long-term issues recur.
Feedback exists but fails to shift the interpretation frame.
Historical template matching is not a personality-typing tool.
DMN is not the FP new-structure generation layer.
Public definition excludes admin template repositories and internal algorithm implementation.